(Bloomberg) — BHP Group Ltd. shareholders have rejected a resolution calling on the miner to lobby the Australian government on climate change, following a vote at its annual general meeting.
Only 13% of votes backed the move, which the board opposed, according to a company filing. Shareholders were asked whether BHP should “proactively advocate for Australian policy settings that are consistent with the Paris Agreement’s objective of limiting global warming to 1.5° Celsius.”
Financial Post Top Stories
Sign up to receive the daily top stories from the Financial Post, a division of Postmedia Network Inc.
By clicking on the sign up button you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. You may unsubscribe any time by clicking on the unsubscribe link at the bottom of our emails. Postmedia Network Inc. | 365 Bloor Street East, Toronto, Ontario, M4W 3L4 | 416-383-2300
The miner’s shareholders also rejected a resolution calling for more detailed scenario modeling in line with a 1.5°C world, with around 19% supporting it. Both resolutions were filed by the Australasian Centre for Corporate Responsibility.
Chairman Ken MacKenzie said the board had given “careful consideration” to the advocacy resolution and concluded that it was too “ambiguous” and would amount to “overreach”. BHP “should be advocating where things have relevancy for our business, and we should be advocating where we have impact,” he said at the meeting in Perth.
Committed to Coal
The miner was “no longer leading and not even following on climate,” ACCR said in a statement. “BHP is Australia’s largest company and it holds immense political power, which it willingly wields on various policy issues. It should be deploying its influence to enhance the probability of a 1.5 degree pathway,” Harriet Kater, climate lead at the ACCR, said in the statement.
BHP sold its oil and gas business to Woodside Energy Group this year, and has promised to close its thermal coal operations in Australia by 2030. It’s adopted a 30% emissions reduction target for its operations by 2030, and wants to get to net zero by mid-century.
The miner — which produces iron ore, copper and coal — believes coal is the only viable option for producing steel for the next few decades. MacKenzie said Thursday that steel was vital to the roll-out of renewable power technologies including wind and solar, and that there was “no known pathway” to zero carbon production.
Demand for coking coal would be strong for “decades”, but steel-making technologies replacing coal with hydrogen could eventually take over, he said. Chief Executive Mike Henry said Thursday that BHP currently had no “growth capital” allocated to coking coal.
(Updates with official result of votes in first 3 paragraphs.)